IT project intake and prioritization, on criteria you can defend

What IT offices struggle with

Requests arrive by email, hallway conversation, and budget memo. Without a single intake, some are lost, some are started without a real decision, and the portfolio ends up shaped by pressure rather than priority. When leadership asks why one project is ahead of another, there is no consistent record of how either was ranked, which makes every prioritization call feel political.

Potential intake review scope

Identify the agency's existing request records, approved project fields, review criteria, and staff decision-makers. Any form, source mapping, scoring workflow, or production feature must be separately scoped, approved, implemented, and verified.

Agency-owned prioritization decisions

Project rankings, supporting evidence, changes, and approval decisions remain with authorized agency staff. No operational AI scoring, scenario modeling, audit system, or customer-connected workflow is represented.

Define the proposed review process

A scoped pilot can identify how your agency would connect its request criteria, project records, and reporting requirements. Each proposed implementation and data-handling step requires separate validation. See the technical scoping guide.