PortfolioDesk
PortfolioDesk › Topics › Replace spreadsheet tracking
Use case

Start a proposed pilot with the project records you already maintain

Discuss which existing project trackers and source records your agency would approve for a scoped portfolio-review pilot. Any mapping, data access, reporting workflow, or implementation must be separately reviewed and verified.

Request a demo Pilot purchasing guide

Why spreadsheets stop scaling

When project records are maintained in several locations, an agency may want to review how status updates, source values, and leadership reporting are coordinated. The actual questions and any existing controls depend on that agency's own records and operating process.

Identify agency-approved source records

A proposed pilot can begin by identifying existing project names, budget records, schedule information, and approved reviewers. Any data permissions, field mapping, import, or operational application requires separate agency approval and implementation.

Potential requirements to scope

Existing systems remain the agency's decision

The agency determines which existing tools remain in place and whether any proposed source access is appropriate. No deployed import pipeline, production connector, operational portfolio application, or customer outcome is represented. See the technical scoping guide.

Common questions

Can existing project trackers be considered?

Agency staff decide which records are available and whether any proposed mapping, access, or review scope is permitted.

Is a migration or operational application already available?

No. Any production implementation requires a separately agreed agency scope, approval, and verification.

Does the agency control its existing tools?

Yes. Your agency determines its project records, authorized users, review process, and whether any new workflow is appropriate.

Explore a portfolio-tracking pilot

A short walkthrough of the proposed pilot and sample workflow for your spreadsheets and portfolio.

Request a demo